Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 4.4.4.3 The role of government in 1.5°C-consistent climate technology policy ==== <div id="section-4-4-4-3-block-1"></div> While literature on 1.5°C-specific innovation policy is absent, a growing body of literature indicates that governments aim to achieve social, economic and environmental goals by promoting science and a broad range of technologies through ‘mission-driven’ innovation policies, based on differentiated national priorities (Edler and Fagerberg, 2017) <sup>[[#fn:r1276|1276]]</sup> . Governments can play a role in advancing climate technology via a ‘technology push’ policy on the technology supply side (e.g., R&D subsidies), and by ‘demand pull’ policy on the demand side (e.g., energy-efficiency regulation), and these policies can be complemented by enabling environments (Somanathan et al., 2014) <sup>[[#fn:r1277|1277]]</sup> . Governments may also play a role in removing existent support for incumbents (Kivimaa and Kern, 2016) <sup>[[#fn:r1278|1278]]</sup> . A growing literature indicates that policy mixes, rather than single policy instruments, are more effective in addressing climate innovation challenges ranging from technologies in the R&D phase to those ready for diffusion (Veugelers, 2012; Quitzow, 2015; Rogge et al., 2017; Rosenow et al., 2017) <sup>[[#fn:r1279|1279]]</sup> . Such innovation policies can help address two kinds of externalities: environmental externalities and proprietary problems (GEA, 2012; IPCC, 2014b; Mazzucato and Semieniuk, 2017) <sup>[[#fn:r1280|1280]]</sup> . To avoid ‘picking winners’, governments often maintain a broad portfolio of technological options (Kverndokk and Rosendahl, 2007) <sup>[[#fn:r1281|1281]]</sup> and work in close collaboration with the industrial sector and society in general. Some governments have achieved relative success in supporting innovation policies (Grubler et al., 2012; Mazzucato, 2013) <sup>[[#fn:r1282|1282]]</sup> that addressed climate-related R&D (see Box 4.7 on bioethanol in Brazil). <div id="section-4-4-4-3-block-2" class="box"></div> <span id="box-4.7-bioethanol-in-brazil-innovation-and-lessons-for-technology-transfer"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic