Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-3
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== 3.9.2 Models Assessed in This Chapter === <div id="h2-43-siblings" class="h2-siblings"></div> The models assessed in this chapter differ in their sectoral coverage and the level of complexity in each sector. Models tend to have more detail in their representation of energy supply and transportation, than they do for industry ( [[#3.4|Section 3.4]] and Annex III.I). Some models include detailed land-use models, while others exclude land models entirely and use supply curves to represent bioenergy potential ( [[#Bauer--2018a|Bauer et al. 2018a]] ). IAMs do not include all mitigation options available in the literature ( [[#Rogelj--2018|Rogelj et al. 2018]] b; [[#Smith--2019|Smith et al. 2019]] ). For example, most IAM pathways exclude many granular demand-side mitigation options and land-based mitigation options found in more detailed sectoral models; additionally, only a few pathways include CDR options beyond afforestation/reforestation and BECCS. [[#3.4|Section 3.4]] and [[IPCC:Wg3:Chapter:Chapter-12|Chapter 12]] include some results and comparisons to non-IAM models (e.g., bottom-up studies and detailed sectoral models). These sectoral studies often include a more complete set of mitigation options but exclude feedbacks and linkages across sectors which may alter the mitigation potential of a given sector. There is an increasing focus in IAM studies on SDGs ( [[#3.7|Section 3.7]] ), with some studies reporting the implications of mitigation pathways on SDGs (e.g., [[#Bennich--2020|Bennich et al. 2020]] ) and others using achieving SDGs as a constraint on the scenario itself ( [[#van%20Vuuren--2015|van Vuuren et al. 2015]] ; [[#Soergel--2021a|Soergel et al. 2021a]] ). However, IAMs are still limited in the SDGs they represent, often focusing on energy, water, air pollution and land. On the economic side, the majority of the models report information on marginal costs (i.e., carbon price). Only a subset provides full economic implications measured by either economic activity or welfare. Also often missing, is detail about economic inequality within countries or large aggregate regions. For further details about the models and scenarios, see Annex III. <div id="frequently-asked-questions" class="h1-container"></div> <span id="frequent-ly-asked-questions-faqs"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGIII/Chapter-3
(section)
Add languages
Add topic