Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-9
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 9.6.3.2.8 Gravitational, rotational and deformational effects ===== <div id="h4-14-siblings" class="h4-siblings"></div> Gravitational, rotational, and deformational (GRD) effects (Box 9.1) lead to distinct variations in the RSL change pattern, which are similar across a range of benchmarked GRD solvers ( [[#Martinec--2018|Martinec et al., 2018]] ; [[#Palmer--2020|Palmer et al., 2020]] ). There is ''high confidence'' in the understanding of GRD processes. RSL rise associated with GRD is ''very likely'' to be largest in the Pacific, due to the combined effects of projected GrIS, AIS and glacier mass loss ( ''high confidence'' ) (e.g., [[#Kopp--2014|Kopp et al., 2014]] ; [[#Slangen--2014b|Slangen et al., 2014b]] ; [[#Larour--2017|Larour et al., 2017]] ; [[#Mitrovica--2018|Mitrovica et al., 2018]] ). The GRD effect associated with mass loss from an ice sheet is sensitive to the spatial distribution of that mass loss. For example, the GRD contribution to RSL rise in Australia will be larger for Antarctic mass loss sourced fromthe Antarctic Peninsula than for Antarctic mass loss sourced fromThwaites Glacier. In parts of north-eastern North America and north-western Europe, GRD effects associated with mass loss from southern Greenland will lead to an RSL fall, whereas mass loss from northern Greenland will lead to an RSL rise ( ''high confidence'' ) (Figure 9.26; [[#Larour--2017|Larour et al., 2017]] ; [[#Mitrovica--2018|Mitrovica et al., 2018]] ). The AR5 and SROCC computed RSL patterns using a gravitationally self-consistent GRD solver given the amounts, locations and timing of the projected barystatic sea level changes driven by glaciers, ice sheets and LWS ( [[#Church--2013b|Church et al., 2013b]] ). A similar GRD solver is used in the updated projections (following [[#Slangen--2014b|Slangen et al., 2014b]] ). The Earth model used is based on the Preliminary reference Earth model (PREM: [[#Dziewonski--1981|Dziewonski and Anderson, 1981]] ), and is elastic, compressible and radially stratified. <div id="9.6.3.2.9" class="h4-container"></div> <span id="glacial-isostatic-adjustment-and-other-drivers-of-vertical-land-motion"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-9
(section)
Add languages
Add topic