Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-10
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 10.5.3.3 Transdisciplinary Approaches to Stakeholder Interaction ==== <div id="h3-52-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> The transdisciplinary interaction with stakeholders has been categorized into top-down, bottom-up and interactive approaches ( [[#Berkhout--2013|Berkhout et al., 2013]] ). Traditional top-down approaches frame the research from the perspective of global climate change as a driver of regional climate risk. Bottom-up approaches, also referred to as scenario-neutral impact studies ( [[#Prudhomme--2010|Prudhomme et al., 2010]] ; [[#Brown--2012|]] [[#Brown--2012|A. Brown et al., 2012]] ; [[#Brown--2012|]] [[#Brown--2012|C. Brown et al., 2012]] ; [[#Culley--2016|Culley et al., 2016]] ) begin with the userβs articulation of vulnerability in the context of climatic and non-climatic stressors, follow with the definition of key system thresholds of climatic variables, and only incorporate climate data to assess the likelihood of threshold exceedances. Bottom-up approaches are special cases of robust decision-making ( [[#Lempert--2006|Lempert et al., 2006]] ; [[#Lempert--2007|Lempert and Collins, 2007]] ; [[#Walker--2013|Walker et al., 2013]] ; [[#Weaver--2013|Weaver et al., 2013]] ), which are designed to account for uncertainties not represented by climate models as well as non-climatic stressors. Interactive approaches combine aspects of top-down and bottom-up approaches. The choice of approach depends on the context. While bottom-up approaches might be optimal in a local context, where case-specific risks are addressed, top-down approaches provide generic information that may serve a range of different purposes, for example, at the national scale ( [[#Berkhout--2013|Berkhout et al., 2013]] ). All these approaches benefit from the integration of fully distilled climate information ( [[#Berkhout--2013|Berkhout et al., 2013]] ; [[#Maraun--2018b|Maraun and Widmann, 2018b]] ). <div id="10.5.3.4" class="h3-container"></div> <span id="barriers-to-the-distillation-of-climate-information"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGI/Chapter-10
(section)
Add languages
Add topic