Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-2
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 2.5.2.7 Risks to Boreal and Temperate Forests ==== <div id="h3-39-siblings" class="h3-siblings"></div> As in the Arctic, warming substantially exceeding the global average has already been observed in the northern parts of the temperate and boreal forest zone ( [[#Gauthier--2015|Gauthier et al., 2015]] ), and is projected to continue (see [https://www.ipcc.ch/chapter/cross-chapter-paper-6 Cross-Chapter Paper 6] and ( [[#Lee--2021|Lee et al., 2021]] )). As a consequence, boreal tree species are expected to move northwards (or in mountainous regions, upwards) into regions dominated by tundra, unless constrained by edaphic features, and temperate species are projected to grow in regions currently occupied by southern boreal forest ( ''high confidence'' ). In both biomes, deciduous trees are simulated to grow increasingly in regions currently dominated by conifers ( [[#Wårlind--2014|Wårlind et al., 2014]] ; [[#Boulanger--2017|Boulanger et al., 2017]] ). These simulation results have been supported by observational examples. In eastern Siberia, fire disturbance of larch-dominated forest was followed by recovery to birch-dominated forest ( [[#Stuenzi--2020|Stuenzi and Schaepman-Strub, 2020]] ). In Alberta, lodgepole pine ( ''Pinus contorta'' ) lost its dominant status after attacks by mountain pine beetles ( ''Dendroctonus ponderosae'' ) caused the canopy to switch to non-pine conifers and broadleaf trees ( [[#Axelson--2018|Axelson et al., 2018]] ). In contrast to the examples above, some boreal forests have proven resilient to disturbances including recent unprecedented insect outbreaks ( [[#Campbell--2019a|Campbell et al., 2019a]] ; [[#Prendin--2020|Prendin et al., 2020]] ). Reforestation, either natural or anthropogenic, leads to summer cooling and winter warming of the ground, while forest thinning or removal by fire has reverse effects, deepening the upper layer that is free of permafrost ( [[#Stuenzi--2021a|Stuenzi et al., 2021a]] ). Interactions between permafrost and vegetation are important. For example, trees in the east Siberian taiga obtained water mostly from rain in wet summers and permafrost melt water in dry summers ( [[#Sugimoto--2002|Sugimoto et al., 2002]] ), suggesting that these forests will be particularly vulnerable to the combination of drought with the retraction of permafrost further underground due to climate warming. <div id="2.5.2.8 " class="h3-container"></div> <span id="risk-to-peatland-systems"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/WGII/Chapter-2
(section)
Add languages
Add topic