Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
ClimateKG
Search
Search
English
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-4
(section)
IPCC
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
In other projects
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 4.4.2.2.7 Economics of coastal adaptation ===== At global scales, new economic assessments of responses have mostly focused on the direct costs of hard protection and the benefits of reducing coastal extreme event flood risks. These studies confirm AR5 findings that the benefits of reducing coastal flood risk through hard protection exceed the costs of protection, on a global average, and for cities and densely populated areas, during the 21st century even under high-end SLR ( ''medium evidence, high agreement'' ; Hallegatte et al., 2013 <sup>[[#fn:r1634|1634]]</sup> ; Wong et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1635|1635]]</sup> ; Diaz, 2016 <sup>[[#fn:r1636|1636]]</sup> ; Lincke and Hinkel, 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1637|1637]]</sup> ). For example, Lincke and Hinkel (2018) find that, during the 21st century, it is economically efficient to protect 13% of the global coastline, which corresponds to 90% of global floodplain population, under SLR scenarios from 0.3β2.0 m, five SSPs and discount rates up to 6% (Figure 4.14). While the above two studies have not considered the effects of hard protection in reducing the area of coastal wetlands, it is expected that coastal hard protection in densely populated areas and conserving wetlands in sparsely populated areas can go hand in hand. Protecting less than 42% of the global coastline would leave coastal wetlands sufficient accommodation space to even grow in areas under rising sea levels during the 21st century (Schuerch et al., 2018 <sup>[[#fn:r1639|1639]]</sup> ). Diaz (2016), who includes the cost of wetland loss, using a simpler wetland model, finds that both protection and retreat reduce the global net present costs of SLR by a factor of seven as compared to no adaptation (applying a discount rate of 4%) under 21st century SLR of 0.3β1.3 m and SSP2. There is no global study that has considered social costs and benefits of responses (e.g., health, beach amenity, etc.) or looked at the economics of accommodate, retreat and advance responses. <span id="figure-4.14"></span> <!-- START IMG --> <!-- IMG TITLE --> '''Figure 4.14''' <span id="figure-4.14-economic-robustness-of-coastal-protection-under-sea-level-rise-slr-scenarios-from-0.32.0-m-the-five-shared-socioeconomic-pathways-ssps-and-discount-rates-of-up-to-6.-coastlines-are-coloured-according-to-the-percentage-of-scenarios-under-which-the-benefit-cost-ratio-of-protection-reduced-flood-risk-divided-by-the-cost-of-protection"></span> <!-- IMG CAPTION --> '''Figure 4.14 | Economic robustness of coastal protection under sea level rise (SLR) scenarios from 0.3β2.0 m, the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and discount rates of up to 6%. Coastlines are coloured according to the percentage of scenarios under which the benefit-cost ratio of protection (reduced flood risk divided by the cost of protection) [β¦]''' <!-- IMG FILE --> [[File:b867d55a5f3933dfe77ecb75a01cc583 IPCC-SROCC-CH_4_14-3000x1772.jpg]] Figure 4.14 | Economic robustness of coastal protection under sea level rise (SLR) scenarios from 0.3β2.0 m, the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and discount rates of up to 6%. Coastlines are coloured according to the percentage of scenarios under which the benefit-cost ratio of protection (reduced flood risk divided by the cost of protection) are above 1. Source: Lincke and Hinkel (2018). At local scales, a large number of economic assessments of response options are available but mostly in the grey literature and again with a focus on hard and sediment-based protection. Similar to the global studies, hard protection is generally found to be economically efficient for urban and densely populated areas such as New York, USA (Aerts et al., 2014 <sup>[[#fn:r1640|1640]]</sup> ) and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (Scussolini et al., 2017 <sup>[[#fn:r1641|1641]]</sup> ). Both global and local studies show that sediment-based protection, such as beach nourishment is economically efficient in areas of intensive tourism development due to the large revenues generated within this sector (Rigall-I-Torrent et al., 2011 <sup>[[#fn:r1642|1642]]</sup> ; Hinkel et al., 2013a <sup>[[#fn:r1643|1643]]</sup> ). <!-- END IMG --> <div id="section-4-4-2-3ecosystem-based-adaptation"></div> <span id="ecosystem-based-adaptation"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
IPCC:AR6/SROCC/Chapter-4
(section)
Add languages
Add topic